Delayed yet again.
The hearing that was originally scheduled for tomorrow in the lawsuit filed by the estate of Dolly Parton against her nephew, Bryan Seaver, has once again been continued, this time to allow the estate more time to file a response to his latest memorandum.
In case you aren’t familiar with the ongoing lawsuit, it all started when Dolly’s longtime manager Danny Nozell, who also runs She’s Alive LLC, the company overseeing Dolly’s estate, terminated Seaver and his company as head of security for the estate.
Seaver, as you may recall, was the family member who announced Dolly’s death in a video posted on her social media back on August 25:
She’s Alive LLC then filed a lawsuit against Dolly’s nephew, requesting a temporary restraining order and accusing him of engaging in a “campaign of threats” and intimidation against the estate:
“Mr. Seaver began his campaign of threats, intimidation, and coercion a few weeks prior to Ms. Parton’s passing…. In writing, he vowed to ‘destroy the entire brand’ and also told her entertainment attorney: ‘I’m not an entertainment person. I’m a killer.’”
In text messages filed with the lawsuit, Seaver threatened to “destroy the entire brand,” while claiming that the “Dollywood brand is dying” and threatening to take his story to Billboard Magazine:
“I’m going to spend the next time I have on earth ratf**king anyone that has ever betrayed my family.”
And he also threatened to go public in another text message:
“I’m going to set up a podcast dedicated to ruining Dolly’s brand partnerships and telling the violations these people have done on us. It’s going to be great. Or f**king pay me.”
He also emphasized his military service and career as a contractor in a September 3, 2026 email to Dolly’s longtime attorney:
“I’m not an entertainment person. I’m a killer. I sold 27 million $ worth of ammunition and arms to the Haitian Police on the day Dolly died. Entertainment is not my game. I have spent my entire career breaking things and spying on African and Arab leaders. And protecting Dolly.”
He ends the email by requesting a conversation with the attorney:
“I would appreciate having a dialogue and communication route with you. I expect you know where all the bodies are buried same as me. Let’s have dinner…”
The estate claims that the attorney later quit due to threats from Seaver.
A judge granted a temporary restraining order against Seaver, who filed a response last week disputing much of what the estate and Nozell claimed in the lawsuit.
In his response, which was obtained and reviewed by Whiskey Riff, Seaver reveals that the comments about “destroying the entire brand” were aimed at Herschend Family Entertainment, the company that operates both Dollywood and Dolly’s new Songteller Hotel. Seaver says that both he and Nozell “shared frustrations with HFE for many years,” and that Nozell also had an “adversarial” relationship with HFE.
Seaver says that he had privately warned Nozell that HFE was destroying Dollywood’s brand, and that after Dolly’s death Nozell and her team had discussed setting up a longform interview for Seaver on a podcast such as Joe Rogan.
He also provided text messages which Seaver says dispute Nozell’s characterization of their exchanges as “threatening,” showing that their conversations remained cordial even after the messages that the estate now claims were threats.
In one conversation with Nozell, Seaver was discussing his newfound fame and points out that he’s not a “media person.”
“I’m literally an international arms dealer and mercenary.”
Nozell “hearted” the message from Seaver, and responded directly to it:
“You should promote that”
Seaver also provides messages from Nozell after the attorney stepped down, which the estate claims was caused by threats from Seaver. But Seaver says that he was told to contact the attorney about an issue getting payment from the estate for his security company, and that while the messages were “impatient and rude,” he later had a call with Pinnacle Bank (which is handling the estate) asking that his company continue providing security for Dolly’s property.
When Nozell told him that the attorneys quit and Seaver inquired as to the reason, text messages show Nozell responded that he didn’t know why:
“I don’t know what the f–k is happening but attorneys are taking a lot of meetings”
Seaver says that he was in Haiti when he was informed that his company had been replaced as security for Dolly’s properties, and that replacement security showed up and began cutting and sawing gates and chains at the property. He says that he advised his employees to “just walk away,” and that the transfer happened without incident.
He is requesting that the judge dismiss the lawsuit and the restraining order, claiming that it’s nearly impossible to keep refrain from contact with anyone who “has or may have” a business relationship with Dolly’s estate, given that many of his family members still work for her companies.
Seaver also claims that his family has been subjected to harassment from the media, and that he doesn’t want the dispute to harm his aunt’s legacy:
“I have declined to speak with the media about this case and have asked my attorneys to handle all media communications. I care about Ms. Parton, her music, her legacy, and her family. I do not want this dispute to harm her legacy.”
It certainly presents a different version of events than what the estate claimed in their lawsuit, and provides much more context than the original complaint and text messages. But ultimately, it’s up to the judge to decide whether to grant the injunction being requested by the estate.
Unfortunately though, everybody’s going to have to wait a little longer.
In an agreed order that was filed today, both sides agreed to postpone the hearing that was originally scheduled for tomorrow to give attorneys for the estate more time to file their reply to Seaver’s reponse.
That reply had originally been due last Friday, October 16. But by agreement of the parties, the estate now has until Thursday, October 22 to file their reply, and the hearing is now scheduled for Tuesday, November 3 at 11:00 AM in front of Davidson County Chancery Court judge I’Ashea L. Myles.
The parties also agreed to keep the current temporary restraining order in place until the hearing, when the judge will decide whether to issue a temporary injunction against Seaver or to dismiss the restraining order entirely.
